Was it the Blog?

Post-Modern Love.

Wednesday, August 30, 2006

NEED URGENT HELP AVOIDING TONIGHT'S INEVITABLE DRUNK-DIAL
Several interesting developments in the comments section, which is increasingly where the real action is (here, too, it should be noted). After Shelasky's musings yesterday on free will, "skinnieminnie5" offered a novel suggestion:
Have you ever thought about playing for the other team... you know... the away team? Just a thought because you seem to be having no luck with the guys and your picture is really cute. I live in LA and would love to show you a good time. I play for both teams....
You have to admit: It would be more interesting. But Glamour will put Ellen DeGeneres on its cover before Shelasky goes gay, so perish the thought. (Alllllthough, today she writes: "Your comments, and even some of your criticism, really got inside my head.") Here, however, is the best comment from yesterday, by "blacksilk3," reprinted in its entirety:
The more I read your blog, the more I wonder...are you using it to drive guys away? The way you keep talking about your "23 year old" and knowing that he reads your blog, he is going to move on quickly...no matter how great the two of you get along, no matter how much you have in common. You wrote that you are just toying with him...well that isn't going to make him feel really good...unless you end up hooking up with him and that is all that he really is looking for. However, you also said that he could teach guys older than him a thing or two, so why are you saying he is just a phase. He sounds like a great guy and you could blow it by talking about him like this. It is great that you are being honest in your blog...however, why are you even thinking this stuff. If he is a great guy, just go with it...don't overanalyze it. Enjoy it!
Finally, a commenter taking the blog itself into account! It's a crucial question: How did the 23-year-old feel about Shelasky's admission that she has "kind-of forgotten about him," and will he just forget about her? Now, for the record, honesty should be paramount on the blog, or else the whole experiment would be a farce. But that doesn't mean Shelasky won't alter what she writes—subconsciously or intentionally—in order to affect the situations she's writing about. Her casual "forgotten about" remark could have been a sly way of brushing the 23-year-old aside. Or, it could have been a call for him to turn up the heat. Either way, it was a loaded comment.(Speaking of which, we learn today that he's in town "for a last minute business trip." Ummmm . . . )

The gist of today's post is that Shelasky and the dentist (a.k.a. the ex) will both be in the Hamptons for Labor Day weekend, and she's afraid she'll be weak and call him. She wants a gameplan for avoiding the drunk-dial after dry martinis with the girls. (Note the slightly pained with-the-girls prose: "I mean it— I'm really going to mess up and call him if we don't come up with a good plan.") Now, let's ignore that, as many commenters today have already noted, this is a ridiculous question. Instead, consider the premise: Her dilemma is a surfeit of guys to date or spend the night with. She's spending Labor Day in the Hamptons. Tonight she's going to a "painfully cool new club" frequented by celebrities, and pregaming that with dinner at a "fancy French restaurant where my friends eat for free." She'll be wearing Gucci. Will we see a widening disconnect between Shelasky ("Breathe, Alyssa, breathe") and her readers, who are beginning to suspect that nothing's really wrong?

2 Comments:

  • At 12:06 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Excellent points, all. (And I dig the re-design.) Your final graf about the reader-author disconnect reminded me of a crucial question: How loaded is Shelasky? All evidence points to daddy owning a hedge fund. After Columbia, she worked as a "part-time public-relations manager at ABC Carpet and Home" -- PR being an elephant graveyard for middle-of-the-pack WASP and JAP Ivy co-eds -- and then landed a gig covering nightlife for US Weekly. Her ex-fiance was an investment banker (they shared a Flatiron apartment) and she previously dated a "fancy-schmancy lawyer -- this total prick, New York City prep-school kid."

    In the Observer piece on her engagement, Shelasky notes that "I was kind of wooed by that stuff." And: "[He] proposed on Nantucket while on a trip with the family."

    I'll admit that Shelasky is an entertaining writer -- and landing this blog shows some ambition -- but the collective status details offer a Wolfean portrait of latter-day upper-crust. (She was featured in the Observer, after all.) So either she's a trustifarienne, or she fell in with the right crowd up at Morningside Heights. I don't hold this against her, but as you deftly note, her readers may.

    (Here's a link to the NYO piece. http://www.gawker.com/news/sex/single-girl-shelasky-once-close-to-becoming-smug-married-194395.php

     
  • At 12:09 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Also:
    "last minute business trip"?

    While hopping a redeye for the sole purpose of a quasi-celebrity hook-up seems unreasonable, perhaps it's de rigeur in Shelasky's crowd. (I can think of one individual who has pulled a similar stunt in the past...) Did he read the blog, realize he's getting the heave-ho, and book a flight?!

     

Post a Comment

<< Home